Opposition movement calls November 6 protest demanding referendum on Rasmale’ deal

Former home minister Imran Abdulla announced the rally to seek public consent before any settlement of people from different cultures and religions under the project.

AtollPost Desk
Press conference held by the national movement opposing the Rasmale deal
Former home minister Imran Abdulla speaks at a press conference announcing the 6 November protest · Photo: Adhadhu

A national opposition movement has scheduled a major protest for 6 November to demand a public referendum on the government’s Rasmale’ project with UAE-based Eagle Hills.

Former Home Minister Imran Abdulla made the announcement during a press conference held by the movement formed to oppose the deal. He said any plan to settle people of different races, cultures and religions in the Maldives should only proceed after obtaining the direct consent of Maldivians through a nationwide vote.

Imran stated that the public is deeply concerned about the government’s plans for the 500-hectare development under President Mohamed Muizzu. The movement has called on authorities to hold a referendum before making such significant decisions on state land.

He recalled that Muizzu had previously facilitated public consultations with relative ease in places such as Addu City and urged residents of Malé and the atolls to join the gathering on 6 November. Imran expressed confidence that the public would stand up to protect the nation’s independence and religious unity.

The government has repeatedly rejected opposition claims that the project could open the door for non-Muslim or foreign settlement. President Muizzu has said Maldivian law will fully apply in the area and that no religion other than Islam will be permitted.

Commercial terms for the sale of 500 hectares of reclaimed land at Fushidhiggaru lagoon were signed on 21 September. The permanent agreement is expected to be finalised by mid-November. Opposition figures, including former President Abdulla Yameen, have also demanded a referendum, arguing that the President lacks unilateral authority to dispose of the land.

Related stories