An analysis published by Addulive examines public concerns over whether large development projects such as the Rasmale Eagle Hills scheme could open pathways for foreigners to obtain lasting settlement rights in the Maldives.
The piece notes that the Maldivian Constitution and existing laws prohibit the sale of freehold land to foreigners. Long-term leases or unit sales under integrated resort or residential tourism models may grant temporary use rights or residency privileges, but not permanent freehold ownership equivalent to that of citizens.
Public discussion has focused on potential demographic and social changes, as well as worries that foreign parties could gain effective control over significant land areas. The article records that both the government and the project developer have stated that no steps will be taken that violate Maldivian laws or undermine sovereignty, and that the projects are intended to boost the economy and create jobs.
Legal experts cited in the analysis emphasise that any rights conferred remain time-limited and do not equate to citizenship or permanent land ownership.
The Rasmale project continues to generate debate over the balance between foreign investment and national control of territory.